Why AAFCO Requirements Are Just a Minimum Standard—Not Optimal

As I have continued my pet nutrition journey (much like your self), and dive into analyzing pet nutrition on my Youtube channel, I often address the label “AAFCO-approved.” The American Association of Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) establishes minimum standards for pet food labeling, ensuring basic nutrient levels are disclosed. However, as I explain in my recent short video, these standards are not a benchmark for optimal health—they’re a floor, not a ceiling.

AAFCO’s role is regulatory, not nutritional. Their guidelines—minimum protein (e.g., 18% for dogs), fat, and vitamins—aim for “acceptable” nutrition, sufficient to prevent immediate deficiency, not to maximize vitality. It’s the difference between a suit that merely fits and one expertly tailored to your frame. These minimums allow low-quality sources and sub-optimal nutrition—to pass muster, while rarely specifying upper limits. Excesses in nutrients like sodium or calcium, unchecked by AAFCO, can lead to health issues—kidney strain or skeletal problems—over time.

In my professional experience, optimal nutrition demands more: high-quality, digestible proteins, balanced fatty acids, and precise nutrient ratios tailored to a pet’s life stage. AAFCO’s focus on minimums overlooks these nuances. Many brands hide behind AAFCO standards, claim to be premium, but simple compliance to AAFCO alone, shouldn’t be enough for you. Exceeding AAFCO can be just as ( or more) detrimental than merely meeting the requirements.

View my short video below—a concise analysis of AAFCO’s limitations and why I prioritize quality over minimums. Pet owners, your companions deserve nutrition that supports thriving, not just surviving. For a deeper dive, explore my YouTube channel or blog. Have a pet food question? Comment below or join my next Q&A livestream. Subscribe to my newsletter for evidence-based tips to optimize your pet’s health.

Hop over to the channel and watch more videos! @animaldoc rea